The carbon dispute resolution method regarding ecological environment is relatively homogenous
除涉及
公益訴訟及刑事犯罪外，因部分碳匯交易糾紛屬于商事財產類，若僅選擇法院裁判方式作為唯一爭議解決方式，則不利于碳匯的商事自由交易發展。若商事法律主體簽署并選擇了“仲裁”作為爭議解決方式，則應當準允仲裁作為雙碳多元化糾紛解決方式之一。
Except in cases involving public interest litigation and criminal offenses, since some parts of carbon trading dispute fall into the category of commercial property, it would not be conducive to the development of commercial free trade in carbon sinks if only court adjudication is chosen as the only means of dispute resolution. If a commercial legal subject signs up and chooses “arbitration” as the dispute resolution method, then arbitration should be allowed as one of the Double Carbon diversified dispute resolution methods.
版權申明：本內容來自于互聯網，屬第三方匯集推薦平臺。本文的版權歸原作者所有，文章言論不代表鏈門戶的觀點，鏈門戶不承擔任何法律責任。如有侵權請聯系QQ：3341927519進行反饋。
